- Home
- Executive Insights
- Our Services
- Insight Archive
- About us
Stopping the Email spiral
Posted on 30. Aug, 2011 by hkogekar
in Communications
1. Respect Recipients' Time
Some emails depend for their meaning on context. Which means it's usually right to include the thread being responded to. But it's rare that a thread should extend to more than 3 emails. Before sending, cut what's not relevant. Or consider making a phone call instead.
The average time taken to respond to an email is greater, in aggregate, than the time it took to create.

Hard to believe but true!. It should be quicker to read than to write. So you might assume a typical email takes a few minutes to write, but only a few seconds to read. However, five other factors are outweighing this.
- The act of processing an email consists of much more than just reading. There is
- scanning an in-box,
- deciding which ones to open,
- opening them,
- reading them
- deciding how to respond
- responding
-- which may well involve writing an email of similar length back g) getting back into the flow of your other work. So the arrival of even a two-sentence email that is simply opened, read and deleted can take a full minute of your available cognitive time.
So, what can we do to stop the email spiral. The Email Charter was created in response to widespread acknowledgement that email is getting out of hand for many people. It started life as a blog post by TED Curator Chris Anderson and TED Scribe Jane Wulf. The idea struck a chord. More than 45,000 people read the post and and it generated hundreds of tweets, comments and suggestions. That is how the final Charter was shaped. Some of the key contributors are listed here.
I hope you find the charter useful and bring it in your day to day routine.
